Legal Opinion

People v. Becker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2010No. E047898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Walter Becker was convicted of numerous offenses stemming from an assault he perpetrated against Pauline and Rudy Neitz in the Neitzes’ Rubidoux apartment on April 4, 2007. Following the incident, police apprehended defendant and found various drugs in his possession, including 10 tablets of the drug MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine), commonly known as Ecstasy.

As pertinent to this appeal, defendant was charged in count 5 with possession of “Ecstasy” for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) 1 and was convicted of the lesser included offense of simple…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. P. v. Jeter CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. Pesina CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API