Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2013No. S198434Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 7/25/13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S198434 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/4 B229615 ZACHARY EDWARD DAVIS, ) ) Los Angeles County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. BA367204 ____________________________________) The question presented here is the sufficiency of the evidence to prove a given material is a controlled substance regulated by the Health and Safety Code. Specifically, may a jury properly infer that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is controlled based solely on its chemical name, when that substance is not listed in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re SassounianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API