Cox v. State

The written instrument under which the lien was claimed was a sales contract in favor of Lem Cobb in which the title to the automobile therein described was retained in the ’said Cobb until the purchase price should be fully paid. The contract contained the usual representation as to residence and promises not to remove the property, etc. The contract was signed by the defendant, but was not witnessed. Over the objection of defendant the court allowed Lem Cobb, the payee named in the contract, to testify to its execution: This ruling of the court was free from error. Code 1923, § 7703; Jones…