Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Day

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1935No. 2 Div. 53PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of appellee’s automobile.

The dispute is dependant upon the existence of appellant’s claim that he traded another . car for that which plaintiff claims was converted. Plaintiff claims that he left his automobile with defendant for repairs, and that defendant loaned him another to use; that defendant repaired and sold plaintiff’s car and sent for and took the one he loaned plaintiff. Defendant claimed that plaintiff owed him in the trade; that he took papers on the car, which were surrendered to defendant after he recaptured it.

It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. BralySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Kabel v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. ASSOC. FINANCIAL SERVICES v. BarbourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Pearce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Eddins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API