Lehman v. Newcomer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
If the letter sent by deceased to plaintiff is a sufficient acknowledgment or promise of a new contract, by which to take this case out of the .operation of the statute of limitations, then the judgment giving recovery on two promissory notes, long outlawed but for the letter, must be affirmed. We find the letter sufficient. Its pertinent part follows: “Now about the money we have of yours. I gave Clara the twenty-five dollars and I wish you would tell me how much interest is due yet and just when the notes are due. And I want to ask you if you would be willing for me to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Barron v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Ferguson v. FonnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Shirley v. ShirleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Vonchina v. Estate of TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Collins v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942