Bradley v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This appeal is prosecuted by the city of Los Angeles and its Department of Pensions and Board of Pension Commissioners from a judgment of the trial court ordering a peremptory writ of mandate to issue, directing the board to pay a pension to petitioner, Mabel J. Bradley.
Prior to instituting the instant proceeding in mandamus, Mrs. Bradley filed with the Board of Pension Commissioners her application for a widow’s pension pursuant to the provisions of article XVII of the charter of the city of Los Angeles, which application was denied by said board.
The petition for the writ contained the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Buckley v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Casserly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- López Maldonado v. Muñoz MarínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Branson v. Firemen's Retirement Fund of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Kenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Carroll v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gilman v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.