Legal Opinion
Aday v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1962No. Civ. 26597PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J.—
Petitioners, Sanford E. Aday et al., seek mandamus requiring the return to them of all books, magazines, papers, records, office supplies and other items of property which were taken from them after an unlawful search and seizure which occurred at their place of business, Number 2823 North Lima Street, Burbank, California, on March 15, 1961. That the search and seizure was unlawful cannot be gainsaid. They were wholly inconsistent with that concept of “ordered liberty” 1 which is inherent in our national foundations and necessary to their continued life.
Curiously, petitioners do…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. AdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Williams v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Monica Theater v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.