Legal Opinion

Coneff v. AT & T CORP.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 22, 2009No. Case C06-944 RSMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants’ Amended Motion to Compel Arbitration Pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act and to Dismiss Action.” (Dkt. # 133). Defendants argue that pursuant to a binding arbitration clause entered into between the parties, Plaintiffs must pursue their disputes through individualized arbitration. Defendants also argue that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts any state law defenses Plaintiffs can bring to the enforceability of the arbitration clause.

Pl…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coneff v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Willis v. Nationwide Debt Settlement GroupDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  4. In Re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  5. Johnson v. KeyBank National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API