Legal Opinion
J.B. v. Killingly Board of Education
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1997No. 3:97 CV 1900(GLG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF ■ LAW
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, J.B., moves for a preliminary injunction to enjoin defendants, Kill-ingly Board of Education .(“Killingly”), Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“DMH”), and Connecticut Department of Children and Families (“DCF”), from denying J.B. a free appropriate public education, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487 (amended June 4, 1997), with accompanying regulations, 34 C.F.R. pt. 300 (1997). In his motion for a preliminary injunction,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- A. S. Ex Rel. S. v. Norwalk Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Cosgrove v. Board of Education of the Niskayuna Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Fetto v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Borough of Palmyra, Board of Education v. F.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Warton v. New Fairfield Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.