Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Merz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing plaintiff to amend his complaint and by ordering a further amendment. Sec. 269.44, Stats., provides :

“The court may, at any stage of any action or special proceeding before or after judgment, in furtherance of justice and upon such terms as may be just, amend any process, pleading or proceeding, notwithstanding it may change the action from one at law to one in equity, or from one on contract to one in tort, or vice versa; provided, the amended pleading states a cause of action arising out of the contract,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. EL DORADO ESTATES DIV. NO. 2 ASS'NAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Carroll v. El Dorado Estates Division Number Two Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mueller v. MerzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API