Legal Opinion

Dever v. Platt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1909No. 16,478PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Per curiam

The legal questions upon which this case must be determined are settled in The State v. Addison, 76 Kan. 699, and Ray v. Miller, 78 Kan. 843. To entitle the plaintiff to recover it was necessary for him to show that under chapter 374 of the Laws of 1907 the appointment of Platt as city attorney was in violation of law and. void. The mayor who made the appointment was called as a witness, and it. appears from all the testimony that he had no occasion to make any investigation as to the qualifications of the plaintiff for the position, as the plaintiff had acted as city attorney under the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taggart v. AddisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Ray v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klein v. Real Estate Commissioner HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Application of O'SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Slusher v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Benest v. McNeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API