Application of O'Sullivan
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This proceeding was instituted by Emmet O’Sullivan to secure an order determining that he is entitled to preference for appointment as city attorney of Harlowton and directing the mayor and city council to employ him.
The petition alleges that Mr. O’Sullivan is a duly licensed attorney-at-law practicing his profession at Harlowton, and that because of military service in the first world war he is entitled to preference in the appointment of city attorney of Harlowton, which position he unsuccessfully sought by written application to the city, its mayor and city council, alleging facts showing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Ryan v. WestonMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Matter of Mullane v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Vennekolt v. LuteyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bennett v. BonnerMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Steen v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Timpanogos Planning & Water Management Agency v. Central Utah Water Conservancy DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Jensen v. State, Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.