Legal Opinion

State v. Mundon.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2012No. SCWC-10-0000101PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold, that the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit (the court) 1 erred by permitting Respondent/ Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (Respondent) to introduce evidence of acts allegedly committed by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant James Mundon (Petitioner) for which a jury had acquitted him in a prior trial. The introduction of such evidence violates the principle of collateral es-toppel embodied in the double jeopardy clause of article I, section 10 of the Hawai'i Constitution. Because of the likelihood of retrial, we also hold that the court (1) did not err…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. State v. RadueIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Commonwealth v. DorazioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. State v. Spearman.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API