Legal Opinion

Reece v. Van Gilder

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1955No. 22271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEW, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for restitution of certain moneys expended by them for payment of a mortgage, interest, taxes, labor and building materials under an alleged oral contract with the defendant, and for an equitable lien on defendant’s land to secureVayment of the amount so recovered. Plaintiffs, have rescinded the contract, claiming a breach thereof by the defendant. The court f^nd plaintiffs were entitled to recover $4,107.99 for moneys advanced, decreed an equitable lien upon defendant’s land to secure payment thereof, adjudged the plaintiffs a life estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Maas v. DreckshageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Schurtz v. CushingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Roberts v. Southwestern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Reece v. Van GilderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FreerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Sweeney v. City of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1951
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FreerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API