Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. City of Louisville

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 14, 1951No. Civ. 1723PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.

This action was filed July 28, 1949, by P. O. Sweeney, Mona Carroll, an infant suing by her Father and next friend Alfred M. Carroll ,and James W. Muir, plaintiffs, against City of Louisville, T, Byrne Morgan, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Louisville and Louisville Park Theatrical Association, a corporation, defendants.

Jurisdiction in the -complaint, was invoked under Sections 1331 and 1343, subsection (3) Title 28, and Sections 41 and 43 of Title 8 United States Code Annotated, to obtain a declaration of rights under the authority of Section 2201 of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Missouri Ex Rel. Gaines v. CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Sweatt v. PainterSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. W. F. (Dee) Derrington and Harris County, Texas, Acting Herein by Its County Judge and Commissioners v. M. W. PlummerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. P I Enterprises, Inc. v. Charles J. CataldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Tate v. Department of Conservation and DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
  4. Muir v. Louisville Park Theatrical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. Lonesome v. MaxwellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API