Legal Opinion
West Chandler Boulevard Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 2011No. B226663; No. B229418PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, J.
West Chandler BoulevardNeighborhood Association, Mitchell Ramin, and Jeff Gantman (collectively appellants) petitioned for a writ of administrative mandamus pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5,1 seeking to overturn a decision by the City of Los Angeles (City) to grant a conditional use permit (CUP) and parking variance to real parties in interest Chabad of the Valley, Inc., and Chabad of North Hollywood (collectively Chabad). The superior court denied appellants’ petition for a writ and denied Chabad’s motion under section 1021.5 for attorney fees. In these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- York v. City of Los Angeles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Coastal Hills Rural Preservation v. Cnty. of Sonoma, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Coastal Hills Rural etc. v. Co. of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.