Legal Opinion
Van Riessen v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1976No. Civ. 47787PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Introduction
Petitioners [appellants] nine firemen retired from the City of Santa Monica Fire Department (hereinafter petitioners) appeal from the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate seeking to compel respondent City of Santa Monica (hereinafter City) and certain of its officers to make monetaiy payment to each of them for unused sick leave days which had been accumulated prior to retirement.
The Case
Each of the petitioners is a retired fireman of respondent City. They claim that an aggregate of 3,100 days of sick leave had accrued but was unused by them as of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Markman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Marsille v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Campbell v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.