Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Nathanial Alexander

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 28, 2004No. 09-04-00153-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Nathaniel Alexander was indicted for the offense of felony “Retaliation.” 1 After the jury was selected and sworn, the trial judge continued the proceedings for several days. Prior to the date the trial was scheduled to resume, a juror contacted the trial court 2 and informed the court she was going to attend her daughter’s out-of-town university ceremony and would not be present on the day trial resumed. The State agreed to proceed with eleven jurors, but the defendant did not. The trial judge sua sponte declared a mistrial and informed the parties he intended to pick a new jury.

Alexan…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  2. Ex parte PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API