Ex Parte Nathanial Alexander
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Nathaniel Alexander was indicted for the offense of felony “Retaliation.” 1 After the jury was selected and sworn, the trial judge continued the proceedings for several days. Prior to the date the trial was scheduled to resume, a juror contacted the trial court 2 and informed the court she was going to attend her daughter’s out-of-town university ceremony and would not be present on the day trial resumed. The State agreed to proceed with eleven jurors, but the defendant did not. The trial judge sua sponte declared a mistrial and informed the parties he intended to pick a new jury.
Alexan…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.