Legal Opinion

Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided April 19, 2013No. 06-11-00065-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Before the mistrial was declared during the presentation of evidence in Leonard *411Pierson, Jr.’s, first jury trial on charges of indecency with a child and aggravated sexual assault of a child,1 the purported victim, Bianca, had testified on direct examination regarding multiple instances in which she said Pierson sexually assaulted her or at least had sexual contact with her. Defense counsel’s first question on cross-examination caused the trial court to declare a mistrial. The question was, “Did you also make an allegation that [Pierson] did these same…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pierson, Leonard Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Charles Clyde Ingram v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  3. Garrels, Ex Parte Elizabeth AnnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Jonathan Matthew Porterie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  5. Jonathan Matthew Porterie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API