Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Zoological Society

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1995No. 94-405PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issues certified to this court are “whether R.C. 4113.52 is the exclusive remedy for whistleblowers and whether R.C. 4113.52 preempts the formation of a Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance [Contrs., Inc.] (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 228, 551 N.E.2d 981, public-policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine within the specific context of whistleblowing.”

We are unable to reach the certified questions in this case for the simple reason that those questions were improperly certified. We say this because Haynes is a member of a union and not an employee at will. Thus, she cannot bring a Greeley…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Boggs v. Avon Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Gary Kusens, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pascal Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Thomas M. Klepsky v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Staunch v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Schmitt v. Educational Serv. Ctr. of Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Schmitt v. Educational Serv. Ctr. of Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API