Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Ingenuity Prep Pub. Charter Sch.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 18, 2019No. Case No. 1:18-cv-00801 (TNM-GMH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J.

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. , an aggrieved party has "the right to bring a civil action" in federal court challenging the administrative agency's decision. The party "bringing the action" has 90 days "to bring such an action." In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge found that Ingenuity's counterclaim challenging the agency's decision was untimely because it was filed more than 90 days after the administrative process ended. Given the plain language of the statute, the Court agrees and thus…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPASupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ajenifuja v. DangoteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  2. Doe v. Duke Ellington Schoolof the Arts ProjectDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  3. Gupte v. NoemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. John Bosco Rayan v. NoemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  5. K.M. v. Adult and Prison Education Resources WorkgroupDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API