Legal Opinion
United States v. Marquete Murray
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 31, 2018No. 17-3006PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Garland, Chief Judge:
Appellant Marquete Murray challenges the sentence that the district court imposed following his guilty plea. Murray's appeal presents two questions: whether the government's actions following entry of *301 the plea breached its plea agreement with Murray, and whether Murray's counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance in relation to that claimed breach.
We reject the government's contention that it did not breach its plea agreement with Murray. Nevertheless, because Murray's counsel failed to object, we can grant Murray relief on this ground only if the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ahmed AbukhatallahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Caleb Gray-BurrissCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Frederick MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Robert Brandon MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.