Contadini v. Devito
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*698 Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The sole issue of this appeal is whether the accidental failure of suit statute, General Statutes § 52-592,1 should have been applied to save the plaintiffs action in negligence and to preclude the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court held that the applicable two year statute of limitations in General Statutes § 52-5842 barred the plaintiffs action and that the plaintiff could not avail himself of the accidental failure of suit statute. The court, therefore, rendered a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, David L. DeVito, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Peabody N.E., Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Waterbury Blank Book Manufacturing Co. v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Davis v. Family Dollar StoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022