Legal Opinion
SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2006No. Civ. 01-2015(RJL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Scimed Life Systems, Inc. (“Scimed”), brought this action against defendants, Medtronic Vascular, Inc. (“Med-tronic”) and Eric C. Martin, under Title 35 of the United States Code Section 146, challenging the Final Decision and Judgment of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) regarding Patent Interference No. 104,192 between certain patent applications for an apparatus for reinforcing a bifurcated lumen. Presently before the Court are Medtronic’s Motion for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007