Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 14, 2007No. C 02-00790 SIPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On February 23, 2007, the Court heard argument on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment on priority. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby DENIES defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
In 2002, plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corp., Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Scimed Life Systems, Inc. and Schneider (Europe) GmbH (collectively “BSC”) brought suit against defendants Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (collectively “Cordis”) for infringement of six patents.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.