New Eureka Amusement Co. v. Rosinsky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff corporation, lessee, to recover the sum of $928.50, the balance of a sum of $1,500 deposited by it, as liquidated damages, to secure the faithful performance of the terms of the lease entered into with the defendant, lessor. The amount sued for represented the $1,500 deposit and the amount realized from the constable’s sale, less the rent due for the months of January and February and March, 1934. At the trial, defendant offered no defense but submitted a point for binding instructions. The jury rendered a verdict for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Auer v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Knight v. Gulf Refining CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Le Bar, to Use v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Gordon v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hertz Corp. v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Volkwein v. Volkwein, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kritz v. AxlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.