Kritz v. Axler
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
Rudolph Kritz brought this' action in assumpsit to recover from Charles Axler the balance due on a Avritten contract dated October 11, 1932, for the sale of certain store fixtures. The sale price fixed by the agreement was $500, of which $100 had been paid when the suit was begun. The case was tried by a judge without a jury and judgment was entered for the balance due on the contract Avith interest. The defendant contends that his motion for judgment should have been granted by the trial court and that judgment should now be entered in his favor. Under such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. HannaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Le Bar, to Use v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- New Eureka Amusement Co. v. RosinskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Harty v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- K.L. Horner v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019