Legal Opinion

Kritz v. Axler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1938No. Appeal, 164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Rudolph Kritz brought this' action in assumpsit to recover from Charles Axler the balance due on a Avritten contract dated October 11, 1932, for the sale of certain store fixtures. The sale price fixed by the agreement was $500, of which $100 had been paid when the suit was begun. The case was tried by a judge without a jury and judgment was entered for the balance due on the contract Avith interest. The defendant contends that his motion for judgment should have been granted by the trial court and that judgment should now be entered in his favor. Under such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. HannaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Le Bar, to Use v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. New Eureka Amusement Co. v. RosinskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Harty v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. K.L. Horner v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API