Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. State Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 245PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that because the appellee failed to produce sufficient evidence, the lower court erred in vacating an arbitration award in an uninsured motorist case.

On or before July 4, 1974, appellee’s mother, Mrs. Helen Reinhart, renewed two automobile insurance policies issued by appellant, State Automobile Insurance Association. One insurance policy, policy number H7-1891-737- 001, covered her 1969 Mercury; the other policy number H7-1391-7S7-002, covered her 1969 Chevrolet. The policies provided identical “Family Protection Coverage”, which obligated the appellant to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Allstate Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haegele v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Caputo v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Gallagher v. Educator & Executive Insurers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Cargill v. Northwestern National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API