Legal Opinion

W. O. Tyler Paper Co. v. Orcutt-Killick Lithographing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry M. Shepard, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, P. J.

The preponderance of the evidence in this case fairly shows that on the 19th of October, 1886, the Lithographing Company, one of the defendants in error, owed the other, Henry Hartt, about $1,800. That on Sunday next before that date Hartt and the managers of the company met, and they told him that the business was running pretty well, but they needed money; and he told them to give him a mortgage and he would give them money; that he would keep it off from the record until they could not get along any more^ ánd then they should come and tell him, and he would foreclose, so that they should…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. CagleMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Frank v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Field v. RidgelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Standard Paper Co. v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Chipron v. FeikertIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union County v. Merscorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Sternbach v. LeopoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Union County, Illinois v. Merscorp, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API