Legal Opinion

Standard Paper Co. v. Guenther

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloe as a part of the opinion: The Standard Paper Oompcmy brought an action against the Ereie Presse Company to recover the amount due the plaintiff on account for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, and in said action Richard Guenther was garnished, the plaintiff claiming that he was indebted to, or had property in his possession belonging to, the…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloe as a part of the opinion: The Standard Paper Oompcmy brought an action against the Ereie Presse Company to recover the amount due the plaintiff on account for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, and in said action Richard Guenther was garnished, the plaintiff claiming that he was indebted to, or had property in his possession belonging to, the Freie Presse Com'pany. The garnishee defendant appeared and answered, denying all liability as garnishee. The plaintiff…

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, <T.

We think all the findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and the only question upon this appeal is whether such findings support.the conclusion of law “ that the chattel mortgage so executed, delivered, and fiied is void as to the plaintiff’s claim against the Freie Presse Company, contracted in the interim between the making and filing of the garnishee’s mortgage.” We think this conclusion of law is supported by the third and seventh findings of fact. The third finding of fact, “that the defendant Guenther did not file his mortgage, at the solicitation of the Freie Presse…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. ThorstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. State Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Goll & Frank Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Clark v. B. B. Richards Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Curtis, Receiver v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API