Legal Opinion

Carrasco v. M&T Bank

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 18, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00532Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * BRYCE CARRASCO, * * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Case No.: SAG-21-532 * M&T Bank, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Bryce Carrasco, who is self-represented, filed an Amended Complaint alleging that Defendant M&T Bank (“M&T”) violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b) (Count One), and the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”),

15 U.S.C. § 1633

(Count Two).1 ECF 62. Mr. Carrasco’s arguments arise out of his contention that he never owed M&T a debt on his credit account…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API