Legal Opinion
Jay Webb Judy Webb Roy Webb Mickey Webb v. R. Rowland & Co., Inc., Douglas C. Gast, Randall Moore, William Brandt, Paul L. Matecki
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1986No. 85-1966, 85-2158PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
Jay Webb and Judy Webb, husband and wife, and Roy Webb and Mickey Webb, husband and wife, allege that the brokerage firm, R. Rowland & Co., and four of its employees, Douglas Gast, Paul L. Matecki, William Brandt, and Randall Moore, in their handling of the Webbs’ accounts, were guilty of breach of contract, fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of the Securities Exchange Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Following the commencement of this action, Rowland, Gast, and Matecki moved to compel arbitration of the claims asserted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Aggrow Oils, L.L.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Securities Industry Association v. Michael J. Connolly, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Edward HOULIHAN; Agnes Houlihan, Appellees, v. OFFERMAN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Casarotto v. LombardiMontana Supreme Court · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.