Rader v. Howell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Perry
Affirming.
J. M. Rader, appellant, and Mitchell Howell, appellee, are the owners, respectively, of two small tracts of land lying between the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company’s right of way on the north and the Kentucky river on the south in or near the town of Heidelberg, Lee county, Ky.
A dispute has arisen between them as to the proper location of the division line extending from a stake in ■the right of way of railroad company southwardly^ to the Kentucky river, the appellant, Rader, claiming appellee has attempted to establish as a division line…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. Big Woods Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Heinrichs v. PolkingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Lanham v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Abbott v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Skaggs v. Ohio Valley Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Calhoun v. GayhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Lawhorn v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Cox v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Oglesby v. NationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.