Legal Opinion
Lungen v. Kane
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1996PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
*862The Sullivan County District Attorney seeks prohibition, pursuant to CPLR article 78, against enforcement of a County Court order requiring limited disclosure of Grand Jury minutes. Underlying this controversy is the direction for disclosure of the testimony of specified witnesses before a Sullivan County Grand Jury to a County Court Judge of Orange County. The limited in camera transfer was ordered pursuant to CPL 190.25 (4) (a) (see also, Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re District AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. Di NapoliNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kurz v. Justices of the Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Neal v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Brown v. BlumenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.