Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Carman Distributing Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1941No. 14,790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr-. Justice Knous

delivered the opinion of the court.

By its complaint the defendant in error, plaintiff below, sought a declaratory judgment proclaiming that certain sales of tangible personal property allegedly made by it as a wholesaler and jobber, to a large number of publicly patronized laundries and dry cleaning plants in Colorado, were not subject to the imposition of a sales tax under the Emergency Retail Sales Tax Act (chapter 230, S.L. 1937), and further asked that the state treasurer, plaintiff in error here, be enjoined from collecting a sales tax thereon. The treasurer prosecutes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bedford v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Bedford v. Hartman BrothersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Fifteenth Street Investment Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Bedford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  5. Auto Owners Service Ass'n v. PollardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Carpenter v. Carman Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Ayers v. General Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Alameda Water & San. Dist. v. Bancroft Fire Pro. Dist.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. In Re the Adoption of T.K.J.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API