Legal Opinion
Bedford v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 11, 1938No. 14,284PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
The question for determination here is whether the general warehouse business of defendants in error is subject to the Public Revenue Service Tax Act of 1937. S. L. ’37, p. 1144, 1937 Supp. C. S. A., c. 148. At the suit of defendants in error under the Declaratory Judgment Act, chapter 93, C. S. A. ’35, the district court decided that the 1937 act had no application to their business and its findings and decree are brought here for review by the state treasurer, who is charged with the duty of en forcing- the act, and the attorney general, who was made a party by reason of the provisions of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gomer v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- People ex rel. Crawford v. LothropSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Belier v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- City of Denver v. Tax Research BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- De Laney v. City and County of Denver Etal. In Re WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Sorg v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. City of ArvadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- In Re LudwigUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.