Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re the Adoption of T.K.J.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1996No. 95CA0531, 95CA0532Published

1Concurrence

Judge RULAND

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I write separately to express my concern relative to petitioners’ equal protection .challenge to the adoption statutes.

In my view, we should not address the equal protection claim on the merits because that contention has not been properly presented. See § 13-51-110, C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6A); see also Armstrong v. Carman Distributing Co., 108 Colo. 223, 115 P.2d 386 (1941). Specifically, the trial court dismissed the petitions on its own motion and prior to any hearing. Hence, neither the petitioners nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re M.M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In re K.M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Armstrong v. Carman Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API