Legal Opinion

Kohn Bros. v. Washer & August

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5359PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before M. D. Priest, Special Judge. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Watts, J. Com. App.

Appellants employed Bex as a commercial traveler, to solicit orders for the merchandise in which they dealt as wholesale merchants, and, to facilitate the business and the better to enable him to secure orders, they furnished him with samples to be exhibited to dealers in soliciting their orders. Bex sold these *132samples to appellees, and converted the proceeds to his own use, and in this suit by appellants to recover of the appellees the value of the samples, on the ground that Bex had no authority to make the sale, the court in effect instructed the jury that if the sale of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. PardridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hull v. East Line & Red River R. R.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Simon & Son v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Thomas Kane & Co. v. BarstowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. D. C. Herndon & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API