Hull v. East Line & Red River R. R.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Morris. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. The opinion states the necessary facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The case made by the appellant is, that he entered the passenger car of the appellee, at Daingerfield, to go to “Veal’s switch,” a point, though not a regular station, at which the railway company frequently received and put off passengers; of which he had knowledge at the time he entered the car. He purchased no ticket before entering the car but, as a witness, stated that *620after entering the car, he informed the conductor where he desired to stop and paid him the fare claimed for transporting him to that place. He further shows that the conductor, upon reaching…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kohn Bros. v. Washer & AugustTexas Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- San Angelo Water, Light & Power Co. v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Houston E. & W. T. R. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Texas Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. SeidersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.