Legal Opinion
Abend v. Haberman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
In June, 1948, plaintiff informed defendant furrier that she desired to store at defendant’s place of business her fur coat and hat which in the preceding December she had purchased from this furrier at a price of $1,564. When the garments were picked up for storage by defendant an informal receipt therefor was given to plaintiff by defendant’s agent. This paper contained no limitation of defendant’s liability on the bailment. A few days after the furs had been received in defendant’s establishment, another receipt was mailed to plaintiff. The effect of this second receipt is the basis for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. Handler Bros. & Winell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Howard v. Handler Bros. & Winell, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Rappaport v. Phil Gottlieb-Sattler, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Rappaport v. Phil Gottlieb-Sattler, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Waldron v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Jasphy v. OsinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Rappaport v. Storfer Bros., Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1955
- Fire Association of Philadelphia, Ben Wacek and Mabel E. Wacek v. Saks & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Fischer v. HermanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.