Legal Opinion

Curless v. Watson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1913No. 7,809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Wells Circuit Court; CJuurles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by James IT. Watson against Ada E. Curless and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

1. The town of Swayzee undertook the improvement of a street in that town known as Washington Street. The contract was let to the appellee, the work was completed and accepted, and assessments were made upon the abutting property to pay the cost of making such improvement. The appellant Ada E. Curless was, at the time this suit was commenced, the owner of a tract of unplatted land abutting upon the improved part of this street, and Arthur E. Curless was her husband. The suit was brought to enforce the lien of assessment against these lands and it resulted in a judgment for the full amount of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Lime City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Randolph v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Albertson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Blasingame v. BlasingameIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Curless v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Enid v. GensmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Valley View Development Corp. v. Cheugh & Schlegel of Dayton, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. City of New Cordell v. MansellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API