City of Enid v. Gensman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Suit for injunction by George J. Gensman and others against the City of Enid and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILL, T.
This cause was before the court and reported in 158 Pac. 377 (not officially reported), but on second petition for rehearing it is agreed by all parties that in briefing the case they were in error as to the law applicable to the ease. Both sides briefed the case on the theory that the law applicable was the Revised Laws of 1910, and the court decided the ease by referring to said statute, while the proceedings are to be governed by Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. Statutes of 1903.
The facts in this case are that the city of Enid attempted to proceed to pave and improve certain streets in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Frederick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Comstock v. City of Eagle GroveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Hibben v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oliver v. Pickett, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Mulligan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- McKnight v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of New Cordell v. MansellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.