Legal Opinion
Boyang, Ltd. And Hee-Sung Jang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1995No. 94-35535Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
67 F.3d 305
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
BOYANG, LTD. and Hee-Sung Jang, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-35535.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995.
Decided Sept. 29, 1995.
1
Before: ALARCON, CANBY, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD,* Senior District Judge.
2
MEMORANDUM**
3
Boya…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hugo Turcios v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Jacobo Ramos-Vasquez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.