Legal Opinion

The Nan B.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided June 11, 1948No. 5865-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

The libellant seeks to foreclose its mortgage against the vessel “Nan B,” given by Leif Leding on August 14, 1946, under the Federal Ship Mortgage Act of June 5, 1920, 41 Stat. 1000, as amended, 46 U.S.C.A. § 911 et seq., to secure the payment of a veteran’s loan in the sum of $10,000 granted under Territorial law.

Chris Leding has intervened, asserting that, although his mortgage is subsequent in time, it is, nevertheless, entitled to priority by reason of an alleged deficiency in the verification of libellant’s mortgage, as required by Sec. 30, Subsec. D, of the statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. American Soda Fountain Co. v. StolzenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Detroit Trust Co. v. Pontiac Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. The NankingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1923
  5. Avery County Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Pasquale Alberto, Debtor. Appeal of Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Gulf Coast Marine Ways, Inc. v. J. R. HardeeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Hellenic Lines LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Lake Jackson State Bank v. Oil Screw Kingfish TooDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1965
  5. In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API