Legal Opinion

Ray v. Simmons

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2005No. 04-3290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Orval Nathan Ray, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, requests a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. For substantially the same reasons set forth by the district court in its Order of July 19, 2004, we DENY Ray’s request for a COA and DISMISS.

Following a 1997 jury trial, Ray was convicted of conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, and kidnaping in Kansas state courts. During state appellate proceedings, the Kansas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Richard S. Demarest v. William Price Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuesta-Rodriguez v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Adkins (ID 94013) v. SchnurrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  3. Cuesta-Rodriguez v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API