United States v. Harris
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASIDA, Judge:
A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of carnal knowledge (one specification) and indecent acts with a child (six specifications), in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The approved sentence was a dismissal and confinement for five years.
This case is before the court for automatic review under Article 66, UCMJ. We have considered the record of trial, appellant’s ten assignments of error, the Government’s reply thereto, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SchramUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020