Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vanbuskirk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1944No. Appeals, 250 and 252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, .P. J.,

The defendants, VanBuskirk and Barfod, were tried together on t'wo joint bills of indictment to April Sessions 1941, Philadelphia County. The one (No. 329) charged them, as officers of a certain corporation, to wit, Coal Operators Casualty Company, (a casualty insurance company), with embezzlement and fraudulent conversion, in eight counts, under different applicable sections of phe Penal Code, but all covering the same transaction, and therefore subjecting each of them to but one sentence. The other (No. 330) charged them with conspiracy to defraud Coal Operators-…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCoach v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Tucker v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. EisenhowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Commonwealth v. HolgateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. WadleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. Barfod (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. BonettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API