Fulp v. Kernersville Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by Greensboro Supply Company from Carter, J., at November Term, 1911, of RobesoN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
This was a creditor’s bill brought by tbe plaintiffs, Fulp & Linville, on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of tbe Kernersville Light and Power Company, which had built a power plant, intending to furnish that town with *159electric power. It bought from the Greensboro Supply Company certain property, among which was a dynamo, boiler, and engine, and the necessary pipes to connect said boiler and engine with the plant. The contract under which this property was bought was dated 21 June, 1909, and title was retained by the Greensboro Supply Company till full payment. This contract was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dobson v. . SimontonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Cook v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Horne v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Albright v. . AlbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Clark Bros. v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lowery v. HaithcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Cochrane v. McDermott Advertising AgencyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Liddell Co. v. CorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922