Lowery v. Haithcock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Defendant loan company, by its appeal, presents two primary questions for decision: (1) Is there sufficient evidence to support a finding that the feme defendant, owner of the land, was a party to the contract with plaintiff, and (2) does plaintiff’s notice and claim of lien substantially comply with the requirements of the statute so as to make it a lien upon the lo.cusf Both questions must be answered in the affirmative.
There is very substantial, uncontradicted testimony tending to show that the contract was the contract of Mrs. Haithcock. She was present at the preliminary conferences,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Cook v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- King v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Cameron v. Consolidated Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- G. W. Jefferson & Bros. v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Mebane Lumber Co. v. Avery & Bullock Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Canady v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.