Sitko v. Rowe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was brought to recover damages from appellants occasioned by their trespassing upon respondents’ property by removing a lateral support, thereby causing the fence and earth to fall from the south side of the lot.
Judgment was entered in favor of respondents in the sum of three hundred dollars, and this appeal was attempted.
Upon judgment being entered for respondents, ap pellants moved for a new trial and excepted to the findings of fact and conclusions of law. This motion was denied.
Error is assigned on a number of grounds. On the threshold, however, we are confronted with a motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Lefever v. BlattnerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Johnson v. California-Washington Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fairview Lumber Co. v. MakosWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Simonson v. VeitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Hart v. CrowellWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. ChausseeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.